🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a revised congressional district plan that could add up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 ruling, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's block that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was written by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling is part of a national fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, redistricting happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation aligned with Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party leaders decried the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading Democratic leader stated the court had another time shredded its standing by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.